In this comic, our students trace the thin thread of solidarity that has woven its way through the darkest moments of history. Beyond the headlines of wars and borders, they discover stories of mutual aid and shared humanity that transcended national and ideological divides. But is solidarity a natural human instinct or a fragile choice we must constantly remake? Can we rediscover the power of standing together in a world that often teaches us to stand apart?

In this comic, the students confront the darkest chapters of the 20th century, where global conflict meets local struggles. As they explore the collapse of old orders and the rise of resistance movements, they face a wide array of difficult choices and high stakes. How do ordinary people find their way when every decision carries the weight of a choice between life and death? Is it possible to find a common humanistic interest in a world shattered by occupation and internal divisions?

In this comic, the students delve into the turbulent years of the early 20th century, exploring the collapse of old empires and the rise of young nation-states. As they trace the shifting borders on faded maps, they encounter a complex web of shared goals and bitter rivalries. What happens when the struggle for liberation transforms into a conflict over territory? Can we celebrate a victory that leaves deep scars on our neighbors, or is every map just a blueprint for the next confrontation?

In the third part of the comic, our students tackle a challenging question: are wars inevitable?
The shadow of many past conflicts still hangs over our present and future. Our characters discuss how cycles of violence perpetuate themselves, often beyond our control. Are we bound to keep making the same mistakes, or is there a way to break the cycle and create something new?

In the first comic we follow students who explore the Ottoman Empire with the help of AI tools. Technology opens new doors to understanding history — but not without risks and questions. How can we recognize the fine line between a helpful tool and an oversimplified interpretation of the past?

In the second comic ghosts of the past appear where we least expect them — among young people seemingly free of national prejudice. And yet, national myths surface during a classroom debate on historical events. Is it possible to study history without repeating the same old narratives?